Grado v. Central New Mexico Corrections Facility et al
David Gonzales Grado |
Central New Mexico Corrections Facility and Wexford Medical Provider |
2:2022cv00793 |
October 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Robert C Brack |
Laura Fashing |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail sent to David Gonzales Grado Returned as Undeliverable re #5 Judgment, and #4 Order Dismissing Case. (jjs) |
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT by Sr. District Judge Robert C. Brack. Civil action is dismissed without prejudice. (jn) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Sr. District Judge Robert C. Brack dismissing Grado's Civil Rights Complaint without prejudice. (jn) |
Filing 3 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The CLERK OF COURT is directed to provide Plaintiff with two copies of this order. (ccp) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Gonzales Grado. (jg) |
Filing 1 1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Central New Mexico Corrections Facility, Wexford Medical Provider, filed by David Gonzales Grado. (jg). Modified on 10/24/2022 (jg). |
Sr. United States District Judge Robert C. Brack and United States Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.