Pharr v. Pinnacle Specialty Group, Inc.
| Don Pharr |
| Pinnacle Specialty Group, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv01111 |
| October 29, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Jerry H Ritter |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Joint Status Report due by January 22, 2025. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for February 5, 2025 at 11:00 AM (Mountain Time). Parties shall call (855) 244-8681 and enter Meeting # 2300 989 9447 to be connected to the telephonic Rule 16 scheduling conference. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than January 10, 2025. (ldm)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alyssa White on behalf of Don Pharr (White, Alyssa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A Josephson on behalf of Don Pharr (Josephson, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pinnacle Specialty Group, Inc. (Greene, Justin) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) Defendant's Answer to Amended Class & Collective Action Complaint by Pinnacle Specialty Group, Inc.. (Greene, Justin) |
| **REFUND REQUESTED** Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9624898 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Pinnacle Specialty Group, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(DePonte, Michael) Modified text on 11/5/2024 (arp). |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (jg) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter and United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (jg) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9615865 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Pinnacle Specialty Group, Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Greene, Justin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Pinnacle Specialty Group, Inc. Defendant's Notice of Removal ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Pinnacle Specialty Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Notification of Service, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit Ex D - Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Ex E - State Court Notice of Removal)(Greene, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
