Page v. Callahan
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Page
Defendant: Commissioner of S.S. John J. Callahan
Case Number: 1:1999cv02107
Filed: August 23, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Steven M. Gold
Presiding Judge: Jack B. Weinstein
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER ADOPTING 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 29 Motion to Reopen Case. The case is dismissed. No costs or disbursements. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 8/11/2011. Copies mailed by Chambers. (Barrett, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Page v. Callahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Page
Represented By: William P. Gottlieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of S.S. John J. Callahan
Represented By: Candace Scott Appleton
Represented By: David Lloyd Goldberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?