Strauss et al v. Credit Lyonnais, S.A.
| 1:2006cv00702 |
| February 16, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Charles P. Sifton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
403
ORDER denying (366) Motion to Dismiss in case 1:06-cv-00702-DLI-MDG; denying (255) Motion to Dismiss in case 1:07-cv-00914-DLI-MDG --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN OPINION AND ORDER, Defendant's motion to dismiss this action or, in the alternative for summary judgment, is denied in its entirety. These cases are referred to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/31/2016. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
340
ORDER granting in part and denying in part (293) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 1:06-cv-00702-DLI-MDG --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN OPINION AND ORDER, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied in part and gr anted in part. Accordingly, the claims brought by Shlomo Tratner, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Tiferet Tratner, in connection with the September 24 Attack ONLY are dismissed. The claims based on the remaining fourteen attacks shall p roceed. In addition, Cafe Hillel Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied in part and granted only to the extent that they have proven Hamas' responsibility for the Cafe Hillel attack. The other elements of the claim must be prov en before a jury. This matter is referred to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings, including settlement discussions. If no settlement is possible, the parties must submit a joint pretrial order for my approval within 30 days of the conference before the magistrate judge. The parties shall adhere to my Individual Rules and Practices in drafting their joint pretrial order. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 2/28/2013. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
283
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Regarding Modification of Protective Order: For the foregoing reasons, subsection 2(f) of the prior Protective Orders issued in these two cases are vacated and replaced by the Supplemental Protective Order which limits the scope of documents that may be filed under seal and requires that future documents filed herein which contain protected materials should be publicly filed with the protected information redacted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 10/6/2011. Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-00702-DLI-MDG, 1:07-cv-00914-DLI-MDG. See attached for further details. (Abdallah, Fida)
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER denying 214 Motion to Compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 8/10/2009. (DeVeaux, Yvonne)
|
|
Filing
210
MINUTE ORDER granting without prejudice 205 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 206 Motion to Compel; denying without prejudice 207 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 208 Motion to Compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 4/24/2009. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strauss et al v. Credit Lyonnais, S.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
