Protostorm, LLC et al v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP et al
| Protostorm, LLC and Peter Faulisi |
| Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP, Dale Hogue and Frederick D. Bailey |
| 1:2008cv00931 |
| March 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| James Orenstein |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
722
AMENDED MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Based on Protostorm's motion to modify the contempt order [Dkt. 710] and the parties' argument at the telephone conference held on October 13, 2015, the Court revises its original order [Dkt. 709] to direct that the contempt award ($224,179.00) shall not be paid by funds in the special-interest bearing account, which shall be reserved for satisfaction of the February 5, 2015 Amended Judgment [Dkt. 639]. Additionally, based on the same modification-related arguments, the Court has decided to stay execution of the contempt award pending resolution of any appeal of this order finding contempt and imposing sanctions. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 10/14/2015. (Pelaez, Jenny)
|
|
Filing
667
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached, the motions to set aside the jury verdict pursuant to Rule 50(b) filed by defendants ATS&K, Brundidge, and Bailey [Dkts. 626, 627, 645] are denied. Notwithstanding Rule 6.3 of the Joint Local Civil Rules of the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the Court will not entertain any motion for reconsideration of this Memorandum & Order. See Somlyo v. J. Lu-Rob Enterprises, Inc., 932 F.2d 1043, 1048 (2d Cir. 1991) (district courts have inherent discretion to depart from Local Rules). Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 6/5/2015. (Pelaez, Jenny)
|
|
Filing
610
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re Protostorm's Motions to Amend the Order of Judgment and for Prejudgment Interest: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, the final judgment will reflect that (1) ATS&K is liable to Protostor m for $6,696,000 in compensatory damages and $900,000 in punitive damages; (2) ATS&K is liable to Protostorm for $561,418.10 in prejudgment interest; and (3) Brundidge is liable to Protostorm for $100,000 in punitive damages. The Clerk of the Court will apply any applicable post-judgment interest. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 12/11/2014. (Galeotti, Matthew)
|
|
Filing
578
ORDER: The Court hereby imposes the temporary conditions set forth in the attached Order. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 10/29/2014. (Galeotti, Matthew)
|
|
Filing
325
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 277 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 281 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 296 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 313 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See the attached memorandum and order. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 11/29/2011.(Fishman, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing
249
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The ATS&K Defendants' 35 and 177 Motions to Dismiss are DENIED. See document for full detail. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 10/12/2010. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
233
ORDER denying 213 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/28/2010. (Rosenbloom, Seth)
|
|
Filing
205
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Because the parties entered into an enforceable agreement to arbitrate and because the claims that Pltffs assert fall within its scope, Hogue's motion for the enforcement of the Arbitration Clause is GRANTED. Pltffs' claims against Hogue are stayed pursuant to Section 3 of the FAA. Hogue's motions to dismiss and for summary judgment are DENIED. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/4/2010. See attached for further details. (Abdallah, Fida)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
