Houraney v. Burton & Associates, P.C. et al
Case Number: 1:2008cv02688
Filed: February 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Carol B. Amon
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the 105 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The defendants' 97 motion to dismiss is granted. Because the plaintiff has failed to cure the de ficiencies expressly identified by the Court, leave to replead is denied as futile. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 2/27/2012. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: re 66 and 73. The Court adopts the R&R as the opinion of the Court. Defendants motion for summary judgment is granted. Plaintiff is granted 30 days leave to replead his malpractice claim based on defendants failure to plead a defamation claim on plaintiffs behalf in the underlying suit and any breach of contract claim based on monies he personally paid to defendants or on a specific promise separate and apart from the malpractice claim. So ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon on 2/21/2011. Copies mailed to all parties. (Angle, Kevin)
September 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER: Defendants move for reconsideration of my 9/7/2010 Report and Recommendation and plaintiff requests an extension of time to replead his claims and a copy of the trial transcripts from 04 CV 2262. Defendants' 74 motion for reconsideratio n and plaintiff's 75 requests are denied. As the parties will not receive this Order until after the time to file objections to my Report and Recommendation expires, the Court extends the deadline for objections: any objection to my 73 Report and Recommendation shall be filed by 10/12/2010. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 9/30/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER, Pltff's motion to amend has been denied. The Court sets the following summary judgment briefing schedule: deft shall serve his motion for summary judgment on pltff by 3/23/10; pltff shall serve his opposition to deft's motion for sum mary judgment by 4/23/10; deft shall serve any reply and both parties shall file their respective papers with the Court by 5/7/10. No papers shall be filed by either side until the motion is fully briefed on 5/7/10. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 2/23/2010) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
February 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER (ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION): On 6/19/2009, the Honorable Lois Bloom, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a 54 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) that plaintiff's 49 motion to amend should be denied. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the R&R. The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds plaintiff's objections without merit. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R dated 6/19/2009 as the opinion of the Court. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon, on 2/18/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
January 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER endorsed on doc.# 59 : The Court makes every effort to decide every case expeditiously. Plaintiff will be notified when a decision is issued. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 1/21/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Houraney v. Burton & Associates, P.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Mark Houraney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?