Southernland v. Garcia et al
| Shawn Southernland |
| Rick Garcia and Peter Castro |
| 1:2009cv02230 |
| May 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Lois Bloom |
| Jack B. Weinstein |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT: Summary judgment, 55 , 70 , is granted to all defendants on all of Plaintiffs' claims. Summary judgment, 63 , is denied to plaintiffs. The pro se clerk of the court shall assist if either plaintiff wishes to prosecute an appeal. They are granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 11/15/2010. (Barrett, C) (Barrett, C) (Main Document 88 replaced on 12/20/2010) (Barrett, C).
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER endorsed on doc.# 54 : Defendants Garcia and Castro, who answered Vickers' Second Amended Complaint, request that all discovery be stayed pending the outcome of the motion to dismiss. The Honorable Jack B. Weinstein referred that request to me. The Court grants defendants' 54 request and stays discovery pending the outcome of defendants' motion to dismiss Southerland's claims and Vickers' claims against the City of New York. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 6/24/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER: Accordingly, plaintiffs' 45 motion to amend is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of Court shall file plaintiffs' 46 proposed second amended complaint. The named defendants, except for the Bronx County District Attorne y's Office, shall respond to the second amended complaint by 5/28/2010. Defendants shall respond to the amended complaint as they deem appropriate. Defendants' 49 motion to stay discovery pending the resolution of plaintiffs' motion to amend is denied as moot. However, the Court will consider any request to extend the discovery deadline once defendants respond to the second amended complaint. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 5/5/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: The Court held an initial pretrial conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 on 1/27/2010, and directed defendants' counsel to provide plaintiffs with initial disclosures by 2/5/2010. The Court set 4/30/2010 as the deadline for the partie s to complete all discovery. Any request to amend the complaint, including any request to join other parties, shall be made by 2/26/2010. Before requesting the Court's assistance regarding a discovery dispute, the parties must make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute with one another. Defendants shall contact Judge Weinstein to request a pre-motion conference by 5/31/2010 if they intend to move for summary judgment. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 1/28/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
