Integrity Electronics Inc. v. Garden State Distributors, Inc. et al
| Integrity Electronics Inc. |
| Garden State Distributors, Inc. and G.S.D. Marketing Group, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv02367 |
| June 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| I. Leo Glasser |
| Cheryl L. Pollak |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, The 134 Report and Recommendation, which thoroughly reviewed the facts and the controlling authorities is, after due consideration, hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that j udgment be entered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $515,222.02, which represented the agreed-upon amount of $380,735.00 in principal, plus $134,487.02 in pre-judgment interest. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties either electronically through ECF or by mail. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 7/6/2012. C-E/M to parties. (Layne, Monique)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 92 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations 100 . For all of the foregoing reasons, the R&R is hereby adopted in its entirety. Default judgment is granted against defe ndants and defendants' answer and counterclaims are stricken. This case is referred to Judge Pollak to conduct an inquest to determine the amount of plaintiff's damages, including pre-judgment interest, and the attorney's fees and expenses to which plaintiff is entitled pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(C). Ordered by Senior Judge I. Leo Glasser on 3/28/2012.
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER: The Court Orders defendants to provide written responses to plaintiff's interrogatories and responsive documents by 7/15/2011. No extensions will be granted. By defaulting on their discovery obligations, defendants have also waived any objections to the requests. By 7/15/2011, counsel for defendants must file with the Court a letter verifying the production of discovery responses. Should defendants fail to comply with this Order, the Court will impose monetary sanctions, recommend that the Answer be stricken, and recommend entry of default. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 6/30/2011. (Sedrish, Ben)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER ADOPTING 70 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, The R&R, which thoroughly reviewed the facts is, after due consideration, hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the pltff's 70 motion to dismiss the Elmann defts an d Digital World is granted in its entirety, and that an award of costs or fees is denied. Motions terminated: 70 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 64 MOTION to Dismiss action as to defendants Digital, Morris Elmann and Charles Elmann without prejudi ce, without costs and without attorneys fees; 64 MOTION to Dismiss action as to defts Digital, Morris Elmann and Charles Elmann without prejudice, without costs and without attorneys fees. So Ordered by Senior Judge I. Leo Glasser on 12/30/10. C-E/M. (Layne, Monique) (Main Document 71 replaced on 1/3/2011) (Layne, Monique).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
