Lopes v. First Unum Life Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Lopes v. First Unum Life Insurance Company

Lopes v. First Unum Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Barbara Lopes
Defendant:	First Unum Life Insurance Company
Case Number:	1:2009cv02642
Filed:	June 22, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Steven M. Gold
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 7, 2012	Filing 31 ORDER DISMISSING COUNTERCLAIM: For the reasons stated in the attached written Order, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's motion to voluntarily dismiss the remaining counterclaim without prejudice in accordance with Rule 41(a)(2), (Doc. No. 30), is GRANTED. As this Order disposes of all outstanding claims, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/7/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
March 30, 2011	Filing 21 ORDER granting 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment: SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED in its entirety. Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED in their entirety. As to Defendants counterclaim for collateral offset, Defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED at this time without prejudice to renew. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2011. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 7, 2012

Filing 31 ORDER DISMISSING COUNTERCLAIM: For the reasons stated in the attached written Order, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's motion to voluntarily dismiss the remaining counterclaim without prejudice in accordance with Rule 41(a)(2), (Doc. No. 30), is GRANTED. As this Order disposes of all outstanding claims, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/7/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

March 30, 2011

Filing 21 ORDER granting 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment: SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED in its entirety. Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED in their entirety. As to Defendants counterclaim for collateral offset, Defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED at this time without prejudice to renew. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2011. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopes v. First Unum Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Lopes
Represented By:	Harold Skovronsky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: First Unum Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?