Brown v. Starrett City Associates et al
| Annette Brown |
| Starrett City Associates, Newman, John Does A-F and Jane Does 1-5 |
| 1:2009cv03282 |
| July 29, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Jack B. Weinstein |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 81 Motion for Attorney Fees. Clerk issue judgment. Close the case. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 1/6/2012. (Barrett, C)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion for Extension of Time to File. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order, defendants' application is denied except to the limited extent described. The Court will extend the November 14th deadline but only until November 21, 2011. Defendants' application is otherwise denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 11/4/2011. (Mann, Roanne)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, plaintiff is entitled to $80,610.00 in attorney's fees and $8,619.21 in expenses, subject to any contractual agreement plainti ff has with counsel concerning said fees. Any objections to the recommendations contained in this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein on or before November 14, 2011. Failure to file objections in a timely manner may waive a right to appeal the District Court order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 10/27/2011. (Mann, Roanne)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff has failed to amend her complaint to identify any of the John Doe defendants; claims against unnamed defendants have been withdrawn. Plaintiff also has withdrawn her claims of malicious prosecution and negligent hirin g, supervision, training, and discipline. A jury trial is demanded. The 36 motion to dismiss is granted with respect to plaintiff's claims against Starrett City Associates under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force. It is denied as to all remaining claims. Trial shall be expedited. Ordered by Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein, on 5/13/2011. (Barrett, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
