Newman et al v. Herbst, et al
| Israel Newman |
| James Herbst, Rhoda L. Herbst, Community Council For Housing Preservation, Inc., Cosmopolitan Capital Corp. and Montreal Development Corp. |
| James Herbst and Rhoda L. Herbst |
| James Herbst, Rhoda L. Herbst, Community Council For Housing Preservation, Inc., Cosmopolitan Capital Corp., Montreal Development Corp. and Israel Newman |
| 1:2009cv04313 |
| October 8, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Andrew L. Carter |
| VJ-Tucker L. Melancon |
| Both |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
349
RULING AND REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: Judgment will be entered against plaintiff and in favor of defendant on all of plaintiff's claims. Ordered by Visiting Judge VJ-Tucker L. Melancon on 2/15/2011. (Corey, Bruce)
|
|
Filing
299
ORDER denying 291 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Visiting Judge VJ-Tucker L. Melancon on 2/25/2010. (Honigman, Jake)
|
|
Filing
283
ORDER, That the Clerk of Court add pro se deft James Herbst's email address to CM/ECF, and that from this date forward he shall receive notification of all activity in this case via email at the email address cchpinc@aol.com. (Ordered by Visiting Judge VJ-Tucker L. Melancon on 12/28/2009) c/m Docket Sheet Updated. (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
