Calabro v. Aniqa Halal Live Poultry Corp.
| 1:2009cv04859 |
| November 9, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Joan M. Azrack |
| John Gleeson |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 31:3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 28 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting Report and Recommendations as to 35 Report and Recommendations: Because I agree with the magistrate judges conclusion in her Report and Recomendation, [3 5], and because I find the defendants objection, 36 , to be meritless, I adopt the Report and Recommendation in full and grant the motion for attorney fees, 28 . The defendant is hereby ORDERED to pay $5,850 in attorney fees to counsel for the plaintiff as discussed further in the attached order. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 9/12/2011. (Glaser, Miriam)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER: The plaintiff's motion to remand and for fees and costs, 3 , is granted. See attached order. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 12/15/2009. (Gleeson, John)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Calabro v. Aniqa Halal Live Poultry Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
