Lanzafame et al v. MA General Construction Corp. et al
Case Number: 1:2009cv04876
Filed: November 10, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office
Presiding Judge: Robert M. Levy
Presiding Judge: Allyne R. Ross
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case from the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).Therefore, plaintiffs are awarded (a) $ 43,657.40 in unpaid contributions and dues; (b) inter est of $ 17,438.92; (c) $ 7,681.82 in liquidated damages; (d) $ 2,775.00 in audit costs; (e) $ 6,799.13 in attorney's fees; and (f) $ 557.71 in reasonable costs. This brings the total amount owed to $ 78,909.98. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is denied. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 1/24/2011) C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lanzafame et al v. MA General Construction Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?