Twine v. Visdorando et al

Twine v. Visdorando et al

Case Number:	1:2009cv05730
Filed:	December 21, 2009
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Jack B. Weinstein
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 31, 2010	Filing 31 ORDER: Defendants move to compel plaintiff to provide a complete response to defendants' first set of interrogatories and to execute a release for his medical records. Defendants also request an extension of the discovery deadline to 60 days aft er plaintiff has responded in full to defendants' discovery demands. Defendants' 29 requests are denied without prejudice, however the Court extends the discovery deadline to 10/15/2010. Plaintiff is advised that if he alleges that he su ffered emotional distress or physical injury to his wrists as a result of his arrest and prosecution, he must provide defense counsel a notarized medical records release. If plaintiff fails to execute a release for his medical records, he may be prev ented from submitting proof regarding his damages for these alleged injuries. Defendants shall respond to plaintiff's 30 motion to amend by 9/8/2010. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 8/31/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
July 22, 2010	Filing 27 ORDER endorsed on doc.# 26 : Although plaintiff should not send correspondence between the parties to the Court, the Court denies the instant application to strike plaintiff's 7/5/10 letter from the docket. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 7/22/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 31, 2010

Filing 31 ORDER: Defendants move to compel plaintiff to provide a complete response to defendants' first set of interrogatories and to execute a release for his medical records. Defendants also request an extension of the discovery deadline to 60 days aft er plaintiff has responded in full to defendants' discovery demands. Defendants' 29 requests are denied without prejudice, however the Court extends the discovery deadline to 10/15/2010. Plaintiff is advised that if he alleges that he su ffered emotional distress or physical injury to his wrists as a result of his arrest and prosecution, he must provide defense counsel a notarized medical records release. If plaintiff fails to execute a release for his medical records, he may be prev ented from submitting proof regarding his damages for these alleged injuries. Defendants shall respond to plaintiff's 30 motion to amend by 9/8/2010. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 8/31/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

July 22, 2010

Filing 27 ORDER endorsed on doc.# 26 : Although plaintiff should not send correspondence between the parties to the Court, the Court denies the instant application to strike plaintiff's 7/5/10 letter from the docket. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 7/22/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Twine v. Visdorando et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?