Nebraskaland, Inc. v. Sunoco, Inc. et al
| Nebraskaland, Inc. |
| BBZZ Equities, Inc., Richard Finkelstein, Diaram Kalicharan, Arshad Kazi and Sunoco, Inc. |
| 1:2010cv01091 |
| March 10, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Cheryl L. Pollak |
| David G. Trager |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
264
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: By Order dated 5/6/11, this Court referred defendant Sunoco's motion to dismiss plaintiff's second cause of action for negligent misrepresentation for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S .C. § 636. By Report submitted 7/13/11, Magistrate Judge Pollak recommended that defendant's motion to dismiss be granted. Plaintiff filed objections dated 7/26/11, and defendant filed a reply on 8/12/11. Upon its de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Pollak's Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Defendant Sunoco's motion to dismiss is granted. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 12/7/2011. (Chee, Alvin)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER denying 58 Motion to Dismiss in part and deferring ruling on in part; ORDER granting 47 Motion to Dismiss in part and deferring ruling on in part. Ordered by Senior Judge David G. Trager on 12/7/2010. (Adler, Jeremy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
