United States of America v. Brooklyn Sleep Products, Inc. et al
||United States of America
||Brooklyn Sleep Products, Inc. and Francisco Chavez
||June 29, 2010
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Roslynn R. Mauskopf
||Cheryl L. Pollak
|Nature of Suit:
||Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
|Cause of Action:
||28:1345 USA Plaintiff
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 5, 2010
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the aforesaid TRO shall be extended for an additional 14 days period until 10/19/10 at 3:30pm. Any attorney appearing on behalf of the deft. shall enter electronically a formal notice of appearance by 10/14/10. Any deft. wis hing to file papers in opposition to the United States application for a preliminary injunctive relief shall do so by 10/15/10. The United States shall personally serve a copy of this TRO on dets. and file proof of service via ECF. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 10/5/2010. (Greene, Donna)
|September 1, 2010
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court orders the following: 1) The Government shall personally serve Defendants with a copy of the Order to Show Cause, all moving papers, as well as the instant Order immediately, but no later than September 7, 2010; 2) Def endants shall respond to the Order to Show Cause no later than 5:00 PM on September 10, 2010; and 3) The parties shall appear before this Court on September 14, 2010 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 6F North to show cause why the relief sought by the Government should not be granted. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/1/2010. (Brucella, Michelle)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?