Felder v. Commissioner of Social Security
||Commissioner of Social Security
||December 10, 2010
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Dora Lizette Irizarry
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
|Cause of Action:
||42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 11, 2012
ORDER denying 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN OPINION AND ORDER, the Commission er's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED and Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. Accordingly, pursuant to the fourth and sixth sentences of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's decision is RE VERSED and the instant action is REMANDED for additional proceedings consistent with the Attached Written Opinion and Order. Specifically, the Administrative Law Judge is directed to: (i) develop the record so as to adequately determine Plaintiff 39;s Residual Functional Capacity; (ii) thoroughly assess Plaintiff's credibility by addressing all of the relevant factors and considering the entire administrative record; and (iii) obtain relevant evidence to support the conclusion that there are other jobs in the national economy Plaintiff could perform, including the opinion of a vocational expert, if necessary. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/11/2012. (Irizarry, Dora)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?