Shiu et al v. New Peking Taste Inc. et al
| Man Wei Shiu and Dan Feng Lin |
| Xiao Mei Wang, Jane Doe, John Doe, New Peking Taste Inc., ABC Corporation and Gen Xu Shu |
| 1:2011cv01175 |
| March 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 203 Equal Pay Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING 80 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court agrees with Judge Mann's assessment of the evidence relating to damages. The court thus ADOPTS Judge Mann's October 23, 2013, R&R and awards award $16, 365.00 in damages to Plaintiff Shui, $18,806.94 in damages to Plaintiff Lin and $17,454.46 in attorney's fees and costs for both plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment and close this case. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 2/11/2014. (fwd'd for jgm) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING 56 Report ans Recommendation IN PART AND MODIFIED IN PART. Jung & Associates, Celis, and Neiman are jointly and severally liable for a sanction of $5,215 in attorney's fees, to be awarded to Plaintiffs and Celis and Neiman shall be referred to the Disciplinary Committee of this District. Plaintiffs' motion for attachment is denied.. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/24/2013. (Marziliano, August)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
