Akman v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc.
| Mohammad Akman |
| Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc. |
| 1:2011cv03252 |
| July 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Sandra L. Townes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER re 48 50 52 Application for Fees filed by Defendant Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order and in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated May 21, 2013, the Court gran ts Defendant's application for fees. The Court awards Defendant fees in the amount of $3,928 and costs in the amount of $200.33, payable by Plaintiff's counsel Joel Gluck. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/7/2013. (Rugani, Meredith)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING IN PART, REJECTING IN PART, 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 37 Motion for Sanctions filed by Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc. As set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Court adopts Magistrate Jud ge Roanne Mann's Report & Recommendation in part and rejects it in part. Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint with prejudice is denied. Pursuant to Local Rule 1.5(f), the Court is referring this case to Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amo n for referral to the Committee on Grievances for possible disciplinary proceedings. Mr. Gluck is hereby held in civil contempt of court. Defendant shall submit its application for fees and costs within thirty days of this Memorandum & Order. Mr. Gluck shall submit any opposition thereto no later than fourteen days thereafter. Mr. Gluck is directed to serve a copy of the Report & Recommendation along with this Court's Memorandum & Order on Plaintiff and to file the Affidavit of Service with the Court. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 5/21/2013. (Rugani, Meredith)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER re 31 Letter MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution filed by defendant. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order, plaintiff is directed, on pain of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal with prejudi ce, to respond, in writing, by November 7, 2012, to each and every point detailed in defendant's pending motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 10/31/2012. [Due to ECF technical issues, a copy of this order will also be faxed to counsel.](Williams, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court has reviewed the unopposed Report & Recommendation, and, finding no clear error, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Mann's R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/29/2012. (Lee, Margaret)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Compel; for the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum and Order, plaintiff's counsel has ignored the Order To Show Cause and has not responded. Defendant's motion to compel is therefore granted, to the following extent: Plaintiff must, on pain of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of his complaint, respond without objection, by June 5, 2012, to all discovery demands served by defendant o n April 2, 2012, and must appear for his deposition on June 7, 2012 (or on such other date prior to the conclusion of discovery, but only if agreed to by defendants counsel). Plaintiff and his counsel are warned that any further violations of court orders and/or of plaintiff's discovery obligations will result in the imposition of monetary sanctions such as fees and costs, as well as a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Defendant's motion for fees and costs is denied without prejudice, pending plaintiff's compliance with this Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 6/1/2012. (Maynard, Pat)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Akman v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mohammad Akman | |
| Represented By: | Joel M. Gluck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
