Jenkins v. Morris et al
Matthew Jenkins |
Vincent Schiraldi, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, Boro President Mary Markowitz, Detective Liam Morris, Director of Internal Affairs, Rose Gill, Martha Hirst, District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, County Clerk Nancy T. Sunshine, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Detective Patrick Crosby |
1:2011cv04178 |
August 26, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Cheryl L. Pollak |
Sandra L. Townes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Magistrate Judge Pollak's Report and Recommendation dated May 7, 2013 in its entirety and this action is dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(b). The Court certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. ( Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 10/18/2013 ) Forwarded for judgment. (Guzzi, Roseann) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, This Court is in receipt of four submission from pro se pltff Matthew Jenkins relating to the above captioned action: an "Affidavit/ Affirmation in Opposition to Deft's Motion Objection/Court Orders" dated 5/29/12 (hereinafter "Pltff's Affirmation"); a "Declaration for Entry of Default," dated 5/29/11 [sic]; a letter dated 5/26/12; and a letter dated 6/22/12. This Memorandum and Order addresses these submissions. (MUST SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 7/18/2012. c/m (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's request for entry of default and motion for a default judgment (Docket Entries # 31 , 35 and 36 ) are denied. Plaintiff's 41 request for appointment of counsel, dated 4/16/2012, is also denied. This Court assumes that this request for appointment of counsel was mailed before plaintiff received Judge Pollak's 4/11/2012 order 33 directing that plaintiff refrain from filing another request for c ounsel until after the conclusion of discovery and was not contemptuous. However, this Court cautions plaintiff not to disregard Judge Pollak's 4/11/2012 Order and to persist in his pattern of filing repeated requests for counsel. SO ORDERED by Judge Sandra L. Townes, on 5/17/2012. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiff is given 30 days leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff should set forth factual allegations to support his claim against Detectives Morris and Crosby and specify the injuries resulting from their acts and omiss ions. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Bloomberg, Kelly, Markowitz, Hynes, Sunshine, Hirst, and Gill are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may still include claims against these defendants in his amended complaint, but only if he sets forth factual allegations concerning these defendants and explains how they are personally involved in the federal constitutional violations alleged in the amended complaint. No summonses shall issue at this time, and all further proceedings shall b e stayed for 30 days. If plaintiff fails to amend the complaint within the time allowed, the case will be dismissed. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal So Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 9/1/2011. C/M to plaintiff. (Manuel, Germaine) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.