Carter v. City of New York et al
David Carter, Sr. |
Mayor Michael Bloomberg, City of New York, Commissioner and John Lue |
1:2011cv05704 |
November 17, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Lois Bloom |
John Gleeson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: As explained in the memorandum and order, Carter's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 2 , is granted and his complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Carter is granted leave to f ile an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of entry of this order. The amended complaint should bear the docket number 11-CV-5704, contain only claims regarding the wrongful deprivation of food, and name the appropriate prison guards or oth er officials as defendants. If Carter does not know a defendant's name, he may name the defendant at John Doe or Jane Doe, but he must provide as much identifying information (for example, a physical description and/or a description of the defe ndant's position at the facility) as possible. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. A copy of this memorandum and order will be mailed to Carter. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 1/13/2012. (Gonen, Daniel) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.