Olivieri v. Waldbaum, Inc. et al
| Anthony Olivieri, Jr. |
| Richard Sicuranza, Waldbaum, Inc., Michael Ibanez, APW Supermarkets, Inc. and James Argenziano |
| 1:2012cv01195 |
| March 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Sandra L. Townes |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
Minute Order: Appearances by S. Popofsky for plaintiff; N. Catalano for Waldbaum; P. Monier for Sicuranza. As discussed on the record and set forth in a separate order, since default has not been entered, the Court considers treats the submissions r egarding of Sicuranza's late answer under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and grants him leave nunc pro tunc to file the answer. Mr. Sicuranza's motion for a stay 79 is denied. Discovery is extended to 6/30/14 for the depositi on of two additional Waldbaum employees, Mr. Drain and Ms. Maul, who may be deposed for a total of day for both. This is without prejudice to an application by Sicuranza for leave to continue the deposition of plaintiff. The parties advise they do not intend to have experts. Any party seeking to move for summary judgment must file and send a letter to Judge Townes by 7/18/14 requesting a pre-motion conference and any response must be filed by 7/25/14. FTR: 2:37-3:32 (Moo-Young, Jillian)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
