Wolters v. Attorney General of N.Y. State et al
| Arthur J. Wolters |
| Commission-N.Y. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, Ray Kelly, The District Attorneys of Richmond and Queens Counties, N.Y. and Attorney General of N.Y. State |
| 1:2012cv01544 |
| March 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted solely for the purpose of this Order. Plaintiff's pro se 1 Complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B). Pl aintiff's applications for class certification and appointment of pro bono counsel are also denied. The Court has considered allowing plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint and finds that amendment would be futile because plaintiff has not identified any plausible federal claims. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of a n appeal. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on the pro se plaintiff and note such service on the docket. SO ORDERED by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto, on 4/24/2012. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
