Reliant Transportation Inc. v. Local 1181-1061, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO
Plaintiff: Reliant Transportation Inc.
Defendant: Local 1181-1061, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO
Case Number: 1:2012cv03621
Filed: July 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Dora Lizette Irizarry
Presiding Judge: James Orenstein
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reliant Transportation Inc. v. Local 1181-1061, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reliant Transportation Inc.
Represented By: Ryan William Lawler
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Pollack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Local 1181-1061, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO
Represented By: Richard A. Brook
Represented By: Richard Neil Gilberg
Represented By: Robert Marinovic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?