Scottsdale Insurance Company v. United Industries & Construction Corp.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Scottsdale Insurance Company v. United Industries & Construction Corp.

Scottsdale Insurance Company v. United Industries & Construction Corp.

Plaintiff:	Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:	United Industries & Construction Corp.
Case Number:	1:2012cv05732
Filed:	November 20, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 4, 2017	Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: For the reasons set forth above, Scottsdales motion for reconsideration is denied. This matter is recommitted to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pre-trial proceedings on the remaining cause of action. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/20/2016. (Taronji, Robert)
September 29, 2015	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the parties' cross -motions for summary judgment are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Scottsdale is required to defend United against each of the Underlying Actions and cannot rely on the specific exclusions it cites to avoid its duty to defend. The cross-motions for summary judgment on Scottsdale's duty to indemnify are denied as premature. United's motion for summary judgment seeking reimbursement of fees it has incurred defending itself in this action is denied as premature. As such, the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and seventh causes of action in the Amended Complaint are dismissed. This action is recommitted to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pre-trial proceedings on the remaining cause of action. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/29/2015. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 4, 2017

Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: For the reasons set forth above, Scottsdales motion for reconsideration is denied. This matter is recommitted to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pre-trial proceedings on the remaining cause of action. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/20/2016. (Taronji, Robert)

September 29, 2015

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the parties' cross -motions for summary judgment are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Scottsdale is required to defend United against each of the Underlying Actions and cannot rely on the specific exclusions it cites to avoid its duty to defend. The cross-motions for summary judgment on Scottsdale's duty to indemnify are denied as premature. United's motion for summary judgment seeking reimbursement of fees it has incurred defending itself in this action is denied as premature. As such, the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and seventh causes of action in the Amended Complaint are dismissed. This action is recommitted to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pre-trial proceedings on the remaining cause of action. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/29/2015. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scottsdale Insurance Company v. United Industries & Construction Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Represented By:	Eileen H. DeCallies
Represented By:	Ann Odelson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United Industries & Construction Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?