Meyer, M.D. v. State of New York Office of Mental Health et al
| Jill Meyer, M.D. |
| Creedmoor Psychiatric Center, Caterina Grandi, M.D. and State of New York Office of Mental Health |
| 1:2012cv06202 |
| December 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| John Gleeson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order ("M&O"), Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's Title VII claims, which are dismis sed, with prejudice. Because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining State law claims, those, too, must be dismissed, without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment consistent with this M&O. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 3/28/2016. (Levanon, Neta)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order, Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 5/2/2014. (Doerr, Mark)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
