Ackermann v. Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc. et al

Defendant: Kimco SI 1339, Inc. and Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sophie Ackermann
Case Number: 1:2013cv01287
Filed: March 12, 2013
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Nicholas G. Garaufis
Referring Judge: Roanne L. Mann
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ackermann v. Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kimco SI 1339, Inc.
Represented By: Allison C. Leibowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Staples The Office Superstore East, Inc.
Represented By: Allison C. Leibowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sophie Ackermann
Represented By: Rodney Stilwell
Represented By: Gaetano Parrinello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.