Board of Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 W.B.P. & A. Funds v. Famous of NY Construction, Corp.

Defendant: Famous of NY Construction, Corp.
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 W.B.P. & A. Funds
Case Number: 1:2013cv01569
Filed: March 22, 2013
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Carol Bagley Amon
Referring Judge: Roanne L. Mann
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Board of Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 W.B.P. & A. Funds v. Famous of NY Construction, Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Famous of NY Construction, Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers Local Union No. 8 W.B.P. & A. Funds
Represented By: Dana Lynne Henke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.