Alvarado v. Five Town Car Wash Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Leonzo Joaquin Constan Alvarado
Defendant: William Brown and Five Town Car Wash Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv01672
Filed: March 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Raymond J. Dearie
Presiding Judge: James Orenstein
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT: There being no dispute as to plaintiff's calculation of damages in accordance with the jury verdict form, ECF No. 64, plaintiff is entitled to damages in the amount of &# 036;4,752.50, comprising of (1) $1,900 in unpaid minimum wages, as determined by the jury, (2) $476.25 in unpaid overtime, as determined by the jury, and (3) $2,376.25 in liquidated damages, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), because the jury found that defendants failed to prove that they acted in good faith. Additionally, there being no objection to the well-reasoned report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Orenstein, dated 7/23/15, and because this Court agrees with it, the report and recommendation is adopted in its entirety. Plaintiff is entitled to (1) $10,980 in attorneys' fees, and (2) $2,608.10 in costs. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the plaintiff against defendant s Five Towns Car Wash Inc. and William Brown, jointly and severally, in the amount of $18,340.60, comprising of (1) $4,752.50 in damages, (2) $10,980 in attorneys' fees, and (3) $2,608.10 in costs. Forwarded for judgment. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 9/14/2015. (Chee, Alvin)
September 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 9/19/2014. (Chee, Alvin)
January 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: In his 10/11/13 Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Orenstein recommends that the Court deny the letter motion of plaintiff to enforce an oral settlement agreement he entered with defendants. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation without qualification. Accordingly, plaintiff's letter motion is denied. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 1/21/2014. (Chee, Alvin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarado v. Five Town Car Wash Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leonzo Joaquin Constan Alvarado
Represented By: Roman M. Avshalumov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Five Town Car Wash Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?