Panzardi v. Jensen et al
Plaintiff: Alex Panzardi
Defendant: Deborah Brewer and Paul Jensen
Case Number: 1:2013cv04441
Filed: August 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge: Margo K. Brodie
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, For the reasons set forth herein, Pltff's due process claim related to the administration of medicine to his child w/o his consent shall proceed. The remaining claims are dismissed. The Clerk of Court shall issue a summons to Defts, and to the US Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons, Second Amended Complaint and a copy of this Memorandum and Order, as well as the Court's Memorandum and Order dated 3/7/14, upon Defts w/o prepayment of fees. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 2/18/2015) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
March 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Court grants Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pur suant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff's § 1983 claims for damages are dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his § 1983 claims for damages. A ny amended complaint must be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. The amended complaint must be captioned "Second Amended Complaint" and bear the same docket number as this order. Plaintiff must use his sons initials in any co rrespondence, rather than his son's full name. All documents containing information regarding his son's care that Plaintiff seeks to file with the Court must be filed under seal. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint, the Amended Complaint will be dismissed. No summonses shall issue at this time, and all further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 3/7/2014. C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Panzardi v. Jensen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deborah Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Jensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alex Panzardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?