Ferraro v. New York City Department of Education et al
Paul Ferraro |
Ralph K. Honore, New York City Department of Education and Marc Slippen |
1:2013cv05837 |
October 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
James Orenstein |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: As set forth in the Court's September 30, 2017 Memorandum and Order, Defendants' motion 54 for summary judgment is granted in its entirety. See attached Memorandum and Order for details. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close the case. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 9/30/2017. (Zdanys, Joanna) |
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Upon a careful clear error and de novo review of the record and Judge Orensteins well-reasoned and thorough Report and Recommendation, the court denies defendants objections, and affirms and adopts the Repor t and Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of the court. Accordingly, the court grants defendants motion to dismiss the individual ADA claims against Mr. Honore and Mr. Slippen, and denies defendants motion made on the following grounds: (1) abstention based on a state action alleging overlapping facts; (2) untimeliness of the claims; and (3) failure to state a claim. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/31/2015. (Gong, LiJia) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.