Stoltz et al v. Fage Dairy Processing, S.A. et al
||Allan Chang and Barry Stoltz
||Fage Dairy Processing, S.A., Fage USA Dairy Industry, Inc. and Fage USA Holdings, Inc.
||June 19, 2014
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Margo K. Brodie
||Roanne L. Mann
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 28, 2016
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court finds that Plaintiffs do not have standing to seek injunctive relief. The Court grants Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' negligent misrepresentation claims and denies Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' CUCL and CLRA claims. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/28/2016. (Reyneri, Rafael)
|September 22, 2015
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies Defendants' motion to transfer venue to the Northe rn District of New York and grants in part and denies in part Defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court sua sponte dismisses Plaintiffs' claims on behalf of John Doe and Jane Doe as class representatives for Georgia and Texas, respectively. Plaintiffs are granted thirty (30) days' leave to file an amended complaint as specified in this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/22/2015. (Plimpton, Elizabeth)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?