Mitchell Group USA, LLC et al v. Udeh et al
| Gapardis Health and Beauty, Inc. and Mitchell Group USA, LLC |
| John Does 1-10, Nkem Udeh and Unknown Entities 1-10 |
| 1:2014cv05745 |
| October 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| James Orenstein |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Upon careful review of the party's objections, the record, and Judge Orenstein's well reasoned R & R 168 , I hereby adopt and affirm the R & R over the parties' objections. SO Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 7/27/2017. (Ramesar, Thameera)
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Motion for reconsideration is denied. Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 2/17/2016. (Greene, Donna)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER terminating 111 Motion for Judgment on Partial Findings; ORDER re 100 Contempt Certification --- By the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ("M&O"), this Court explains the sanctions imposed at the Order to Show Cause Hearing held on August 20, 2015. At that time and by this Order, this Court adopts the magistrate judge's recommendations made in his Contempt Certification Order of August 12, 2015 and hereby finds the Timite Defendants, Timite and Attorney Pablo E. Bustos in civil contempt of this Court's lawful authority with respect to the court orders referenced in the M&O. Accordingly, the Timite Defendants are precluded from offering any evidence in any future proceedings in this case that includes in formation that heretofore should have been produced. The Timite Defendants were further ordered to remit payment of $16,250.00 to plaintiffs by September 20, 2015 for their repeated failures to produce the requested and court-ordered discovery. Bustos was sanctioned with the imposition of a $500.00 fine payable to the Court by September 20, 2015. Bustos' motion to be relieved as counsel for the Timite Defendants is granted. This Electronic Order and Attached M&O are effective nunc pro tunc to August 20, 2015. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 11/5/2015. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER denying 106 Motion for Discovery. For the reasons set forth in the attached document, I deny the Timite Defendants' requests to reopen discovery and to permit the untimely filing of an amended Answer. To the extent the Timite Defendants seek relief with respect to sanctions I did not impose, I respectfully defer to Judge Irizarry to rule on the request. The Timite Defendants' request for a telephone conference is denied as unnecessary. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 9/17/2015. (Orenstein, James)
|
|
Filing
34
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and EXPEDITED DISCOVERY ORDER. So Ordered by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 2/17/2015. (Carosella, Christy)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN ORDER FOR CONSENT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, TO UNSEAL THE ACTION AND USE OF SEIZED BUSINESS RECORDS IN FURTHERANCE OF THE A CTION, Plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction, expedited discovery, use of seized business records, and to unseal this case is GRANTED. This matter is referred to the magistrate judge to set an expedited initial conference and discover y schedule. Plaintiffs are directed to serve a copy of this Electronic Order on pro se defendants within five days of the date of this Order and immediately thereafter file proof of such service via ECF. The Clerk of the Court is directed to unseal this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 10/7/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
