Trisvan v. Annucci et al
| John Trisvan |
| Anthony Annucci, A. Gould, Y. King and A. McCleary |
| 1:2014cv06016 |
| October 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 142 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants Defendants' summary judgment motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff at the address of record and close this case. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/24/2021. (Bacchi, Joseph)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Accordingly, because the issue was not raised by Defendants, the Court declines to consider whether Annucci and Gaynor are entitled to qualified immunity for Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation cla im. The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' 112 motion to dismiss. The Court denies the motion as to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Annucci and Gaynor. The Court grants the motion as to all o ther remaining claims and dismisses those claims without leave to amend. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 5/30/2019. (Copy of this Order and the attached copies of all unreported cases cited herein sent to pro se Plaintiff.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff filed an 88 Order to Show Cause on 6/20/2018, seeking a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction releasing him from parole supervision. Defendants 93 oppose Plaintiff's applicatio ns. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies Plaintiff's 88 application for temporary and preliminary injunctive relief. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 11/5/2018. (Copy of this Order and the attached copies of all unpublished decisions cited herein sent to pro se Plaintiff.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER granting 63 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 75 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, the Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss, and grants Plaintiff leave to file a fourth amended complaint within thirty (30) days. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 1/9/2018. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 1/9/2018. (Chu, Chan Hee)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting 52 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dimiss and grants Plaintiff leave to file a third amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 12/16/2016. (Hawkins, Salah)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Court grants Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff's 6 Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 4/29/2015. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
