Greenidge v. NYC Human Resource Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Greenidge v. NYC Human Resource Administration

Greenidge v. NYC Human Resource Administration

Plaintiff:	Fiona Greenidge
Defendant:	NYC Human Resource Administration
Case Number:	1:2014cv07360
Filed:	December 15, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Sandra L. Townes
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 14, 2015	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's amended pleading fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Since the pro se plaintiff has already been afforded the opportunity to amend her pleading an d since it would be futile to give her another opportunity, this action is dismissed in its entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 8/11/2015. Copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Barrett, C)
February 6, 2015	Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. However, in an abundance of caution, this Court will grant plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint on or before March 6, 2015. No summonses shall issue at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed pending plaintiff's submission of her amended complaint. If plainti ff fails to file her amended complaint within the time allowed, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice to plaintiff. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore infornia pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 2/5/2015. Copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Barrett, C)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 14, 2015

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's amended pleading fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Since the pro se plaintiff has already been afforded the opportunity to amend her pleading an d since it would be futile to give her another opportunity, this action is dismissed in its entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 8/11/2015. Copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Barrett, C)

February 6, 2015

Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. However, in an abundance of caution, this Court will grant plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint on or before March 6, 2015. No summonses shall issue at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed pending plaintiff's submission of her amended complaint. If plainti ff fails to file her amended complaint within the time allowed, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice to plaintiff. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore infornia pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 2/5/2015. Copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Barrett, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greenidge v. NYC Human Resource Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fiona Greenidge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: NYC Human Resource Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?