Washington et al v. The New York City Police Department
Ziare Cook and Ursula Washington |
The New York City Police Department |
Detective Islund |
1:2015cv01162 |
March 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Robert M. Levy |
Eric N. Vitaliano |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: As set forth in the Court's July 17, 2017 Memorandum of Decision and Order, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 29 is hereby DENIED in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is hereby respectfully requested to serve a copy of this Memorandum of Decision and Order on the pro se Plaintiffs. See attached Memorandum of Decision and Order for details. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 7/17/2017.(Figueroa, Tiffani) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Corporation Counsel is directed to endeavor to ascertain the full name and shield number of the officer from the 88th Pct. involved in the November 20, 2014 search and arrest referred to in pltffs' complaint. The City o f NY need not, though it may, undertake to defend or indemnify the identified NYPD officer at this juncture; this Order merely provides a protocol by which this deft may be properly identified and served. The Corporation Counsel shall provide this information by 2/19/16. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 1/17/2016) c/m (Galeano, Sonia) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.