Arias v. 76 Taqueria No. 2 Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Fidela Arias
Defendant: 76 Taqueria No. 2 Corp., 79-11 Coatzingo Restaurant Inc., Maximo Doe, Manuel Sanchez and Rufino Zapata
Case Number: 1:2015cv02410
Filed: April 28, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge: Kiyo A. Matsumoto
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, the court adopts Judge Bloom's thorough and well-reasoned recommendations. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for settlement approval 25 is DENIED wi thout prejudice. The parties are granted leave to file a new motion for settlement approval which addresses the concerns raised by Judge Bloom's report and recommendations 26 . The court further ORDERS: (1) plaintiff's request to withdraw her motion for default judgment 22 is GRANTED; (2) plaintiff's motion for extension of time 28 is GRANTED, and the parties shall file a new motion for settlement approval within thirty (30) days of this Order; (3) plaintiff shall serve a cop y of this Order on defendants; (4) defendants shall immediately file a notice of appearance on ECF; and (5) the parties shall consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction such that Judge Bloom may rule on the motion for settlement approval without need for a Report and Recommendation. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 7/5/2017. (Grover, Vanish)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arias v. 76 Taqueria No. 2 Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 76 Taqueria No. 2 Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 79-11 Coatzingo Restaurant Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maximo Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manuel Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rufino Zapata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fidela Arias
Represented By: Michael A. Faillace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?