Swanson v. The City Of New York et al
||Corizon Health Incorporated, GMDC Medical Clinic/Medical Facility, GMDC Facility, John and Jane Does, New York City Department of Corrections Commissioner Joseph Ponte, Rikers Island Correctional Facility, The City Of New York, The New York City Department of Corrections and The New York City Department of Health
||June 17, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Margo K. Brodie
||Robert M. Levy
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 21, 2017
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 21 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court grants the City's motion to dismiss for failu re to state a claim and dismisses Plaintiff's claims under the Fourth and Eighth Amendments and Plaintiff's claims for conspiracy, failure to intervene, supervisory liability, municipal liability, "caused to be subjected" and negl igent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff shall serve Defendants with a signed and sealed summons and the Amended Complaint, in compliance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, within thirty (30) days of today's date. If Plaintiff fails to serve Defendants in compliance with Rule 4 within thirty days, the Court will dismiss the Amended Complaint. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/21/2017. (Haji, Sara)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?