Louissaint v. Target Corporation
| Louissaint and Manetude Louissaint |
| Target Corporation and Target Corporation doing business as Target Stores |
| 1:2017cv01103 |
| February 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nina Gershon |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATION OF DISCONTINUANCE with prejudice. So Ordered. Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 3/1/2018. (Barrett, C)
|
|
Terminated Scheduling Order: All deadlines and conferences previously scheduled before Magistrate Judge Reyes are cancelled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 2/26/2018. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Discontinuance by Target Corporation (Spitz, Alice) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Telephone Conference held on 1/12/2018. Appearances by Fredric S. Masure, Esq. for the Plaintiff and Alice Spitz, Esq. for the Defendant. Discussions held. Defendants should respond to Plaintiff's settlement demand by 1/29/2018. Telephone Conference set for 3/16/2018 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Further extension of discovery, if needed, will be discussed at the 3/16/2018 telephone conference. (FTR Log #10:07:43-10:16:42 (208N)) (Strong, Ardis) |
| Minute Order. for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr:Status Conference held on 10/3/2017. Case called. Appearances: Fredric S. Masure, Esq., (appeared by telephone) for Plaintiff; Alice Spitz, Esq., for Defendant. Discussions held on the record re #10 Motion to Compel. Granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery until 4/16/2018. The 12/6/2017 Final Pretrial Conference is adjourned to 4/17/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., Telephone Conference set for 1/12/2018 at 10:00 AM, call to be initiated by defendant's counsel. (See [10-1] for other deadlines). Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide defendant's counsel with the medical authorization by 10/13/2017. (FTR Log #11:45:45-11:53:54.) (Vertus, Miriam) |
| Filing 10 First MOTION to Compel Discovery, First MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Revised Case Management Plan) (Spitz, Alice) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr.: Telephone Conference held on 7/26/2017. Appearances: Fredric S. Masure, Esq., for Plaintiff; Alice Spitz, Esq., for Defendant. Discussions held. Further proceedings pursuant to existing schedule. (Tape #10:41:29-10:46:33 (208N).) (Naidich, Zachary) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Oisin Lambe on behalf of Target Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Lambe, Oisin) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr:Initial Conference Hearing held on 6/5/2017. Case called. Appearances stated on the record. Discussions held. The parties' Case Management Plan #8 is adopted by the Court. All discovery, including depositions of experts, shall be completed on or before 12/5/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/6/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr., Status Conference set for 10/3/2017 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., Telephone Conference set for 7/26/2017 at 10:30 AM, call to be initiated by plaintiff's counsel.(Tape #3:12:11-3:25:00.) (Vertus, Miriam) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order Case Management Plan by Target Corporation (Spitz, Alice) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: The 5/17/17 Initial Conference is rescheduled for 6/5/2017 at 3:00 PM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. (Vertus, Miriam) |
|
ORDER: Due to conflict in the Court's calendar the 5/17/2017 Initial Conference is cancelled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 5/16/2017. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
| Filing 7 Proposed Scheduling Order Case Management Plan by Target Corporation (Spitz, Alice) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference rescheduled for 5/17/2017 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr. The parties are directed to electronically file the completed Case Management Statement (see doc. no #6 ) on CM/ECF by 5/12/2017. (Vertus, Miriam) |
|
Terminated Scheduling Order: Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar the 4/25/2017 conference is adjourned. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 4/24/2017. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 4/25/2017 at 12:00 PM before in Courtroom 2E North before Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes Jr., located in the United States Eastern District of New York Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201. All counsel are required to attend, and plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all counsel are aware of their obligation to appear. Any requests for adjournment must be made in writing on notice to opposing parties, and must disclose whether all parties consent. No request for adjournment will be considered unless made at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Prior to the conference, the parties are to comply with the requirements of Rule 26(f) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. (See main document) Case Management Statement must be completed and filed on ECF no later than 4/20/2017. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 4/3/2017. (Vertus, Miriam)
|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL served on Frederic Masure,Esq., Law Offices of Frederic Masure, Attorneys for Plaintiff and Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County on March 1, 2017 and March 2, 2017, filed by Target Corporation. (Spitz, Alice) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Nina Gershon and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Target Corporation (Spitz, Alice) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Supreme Court, Kings County, case number 521875/2016. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-9323389) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Spitz, Alice) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
