Mullins v. Graham

Mullins v. Graham

Petitioner:	William Mullins
Respondent:	Harold D. Graham
Case Number:	1:2017cv02958
Filed:	May 12, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Margo K. Brodie
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2023	Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DECISION, Mullins has failed to show a basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Accordingly, his habeas petition is denied. Additionally, I decline to issue acertificate of appealability because Mullins has not made a substantial sho wing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), I certify that any appeal taken from this decision and order would not be taken in good faith. So Ordered by Circuit Judge VJ-Denny Chin on 3/31/2023. (TLH)
March 6, 2018	Filing 16 ORDER denying 9 Motion to Stay. For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies Petitioner's motion to hold his petition in abeyance and to amend his petition. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/6/2018. (Chu, Chan Hee)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2023

Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DECISION, Mullins has failed to show a basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Accordingly, his habeas petition is denied. Additionally, I decline to issue acertificate of appealability because Mullins has not made a substantial sho wing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), I certify that any appeal taken from this decision and order would not be taken in good faith. So Ordered by Circuit Judge VJ-Denny Chin on 3/31/2023. (TLH)

March 6, 2018

Filing 16 ORDER denying 9 Motion to Stay. For the reasons discussed in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court denies Petitioner's motion to hold his petition in abeyance and to amend his petition. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/6/2018. (Chu, Chan Hee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mullins v. Graham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Harold D. Graham
Represented By:	Howard Barry Goodman
Represented By:	KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William Mullins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?