Atkins-Payne v. NYC 67th Precinct et al
||Police Officer Gene, Sgt./P.O. Officer Jane Doe, Police Officer John Doe, Kings County Criminal Court, Lieutenant McLaughlin, NYC 67th Precinct, New York City Police Department and Police Officer Rodriguez
||May 12, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Robert M. Levy
||Eric N. Vitaliano
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 13, 2019
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, In accordance with that standard of review, the Court has carefully examined Judge Levy's R&R, and finds it to be correct, well-reasoned and free of any clear error. The Court, therefore, adopts the R&R , in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court. For the foregoing reasons. Magistrate Judge Levy's R&R is adopted, in its entirety, as theopinion of the Court. The Corporation Counsel's 11 motion is granted, and these actions are dismisse d with prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Orderwould not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close these cases. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 5/09/2019) C/M Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia)
|August 22, 2018
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs' claims against NYPD, the 67th Precinct, and the Kings County Criminal Court, as well as Patricia Atkins-Payne's false arrest claim, are dismissed w ith prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption and the docket to delete NYPD, the 67th Precinct, and the Kings County Criminal Court as defendants.The remaining claims against the fi ve remaining defendants may proceed in each action. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses to the remaining defendants in both cases. The United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons and complaints and this Order on tho se defendants without prepayment of fees. As to the two Doe defendants, pursuant to Valentin v. Dinkins, 121 F.3d 72 (2d. Cir. 1997) (per curiam), the Corporation Counsel is hereby requested to produce the information specified above regarding the i dentity and service address of the partially identified Doe defendants within 30 days of the entry of this Order on the docket. Once this information is provided, plaintiffs complaints shall be deemed amended to reflect the full names of these defend ants, summonses shall be issued, and the Court shall direct service on these defendants.The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of the complaints and this Order to the New York City Law Department, and a copy of this Memorandum and Order to both plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 7/31/2018. (Mejia, Benjamin)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?