McLeod v. Llano et al
| Malik McLeod |
| John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Yahaira Llano |
| New York City Law Department |
| 1:2017cv06062 |
| October 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Steven M. Gold |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER: This order resolves various pre-trial issues, including motions in limine submitted by both plaintiff and defendant. For the reasons set forth in the attached opinion and order, I (1) grant defendant's motion to decide the third-party ind emnification claim after trial; (2) deny defendant's motion to bifurcate punitive damages; (3) grant defendant's motion to exclude all mention of the CCRB investigation, the NYPD administrative trial, and their respective findings, and deny plaintiff's motion to admit such evidence; (4) deny defendant's motion to categorically exclude the NYPD Patrol Guide and deny plaintiff's motion to admit specified portions of the Patrol Guide; (5) grant plaintiff's motion to pr eclude references to his previous contacts with law enforcement; (6) deny defendant's motion to admit plaintiff's guilty plea to disorderly conduct; (7) deny plaintiff's motion to exclude evidence that defendant had heard of car break- ins in the area of the incident; (8) deny defendant's motion to preclude the testimony of Latoya Rushion; (9) grant plaintiff's motion to ask Officer Jean Prinston leading questions on direct examination; (10) deny plaintiff's motion t o preclude evidence of awards or commendations as moot; (11) grant defendant's motion to admit certain contested documents; (12) grant plaintiff's motion to admit certain contested documents; (13) deny plaintiff's motion to cross-exami ne Captain Sidhu Madhu on his disciplinary history; (14) grant defendant's motion to preclude evidence of Officer Prinston's disciplinary history; and (15) direct defendant to submit revised proposed special interrogatories. Additionall y, I set the following deadlines: (1) any requests to charge the jury or to give limiting instructions are due no later than fourteen days from the date of this opinion; (2) joint redacted versions of defendant's contested exhibits or a letter o utlining redaction disputes are due no later than fourteen days from the date of this opinion; and (3) revised special interrogatories are due no later than fourteen days from the date of this opinion. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 4/28/2021. (Roeck, Victoria)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion for Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal: Defendant is directed to electronically file an appropriately redacted motion to adjourn no later than September 18, 2020 at 5:00 P.M. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 9/18/2020. (Roeck, Victoria)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Dismiss: For the reasons stated in this opinion, defendants' motion to dismiss McLeod's claims against Officer Prinston, Lieutenant Madhu, and the City is granted. The City's motion to dismiss Officer Llano's third-party indemnification claim is denied. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 3/12/2019. (Gifford, Alison)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
