Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.v. Brach et al
| Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. |
| Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC and John Does 1-100 |
| 1:2018cv02338 |
| April 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Daren S. Garcia on behalf of Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Garcia, Daren) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Terrell B. Finney on behalf of Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Finney, Terrell) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion re #16 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference filed by Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.. (Finney, Terrell) |
| Filing 16 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC. (Semmel, Russell) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Berkowitz on behalf of Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC (aty to be noticed) (Berkowitz, Mark) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony F. LoCicero on behalf of Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC (aty to be noticed) (LoCicero, Anthony) |
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for defendants Hershel Brach and Eminah Properties LLC., to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to June 11, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 5/10/2018. (Riquelme, Claudia)
|
| Filing 13 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, on Consent, by Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC. (Silber, Meyer) |
|
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Daren S. Garcia is permitted to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 5/8/2018. (Riquelme, Claudia)
|
|
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Terrell B. Finney is permitted to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 5/8/2018. (Riquelme, Claudia)
|
| Filing 12 Notice of MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of T. Blake Finney Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0207-10411694. by Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support Affidavit of T. Blake Finney, #2 Admission Information Certificate of Good Standing) (Finney, Terrell) |
| Filing 11 Notice of MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Daren S. Garcia Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0207-10411650. by Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support Affidavit of Daren Garcia, #2 Admission Information Certificate of Good Standing) (Garcia, Daren) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.. Hershel Brach served on 4/26/2018, answer due 5/17/2018; Eminah Properties LLC served on 4/26/2018, answer due 5/17/2018. (Raymond, Peter) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John Michael Peterson on behalf of Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC (aty to be noticed) (Peterson, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Russell Andrew Semmel on behalf of Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC (aty to be noticed) (Semmel, Russell) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Meyer Y. Silber on behalf of Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC (aty to be noticed) (Silber, Meyer) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (Raymond, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (Raymond, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Damages and Injunctive Relief against Hershel Brach, Eminah Properties LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10371911 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (Raymond, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
