Biozone Laboratories, Inc. v. Next Step Laboratories Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Biozone Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant: Next Step Laboratories Corp. and Richard Rigg
Case Number: 1:2018cv03296
Filed: June 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2018 Filing 25 ANSWER to #15 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Biozone Laboratories, Inc.. (Hatch, Ryan)
July 18, 2018 Filing 24 Minute Entry and Order for proceedings held before Judge Brian M. Cogan: Initial Status Conference held on 7/18/2018. Plaintiff shall keep the Court apprised of any developments in the parties' related action currently pending in Northern District of California. The parties shall proceed according to the following schedule, which shall not be altered absent good cause. (Guzzi, Roseann)
July 17, 2018 Filing 23 Letter Motion to Appear by Telephone if necessary by Biozone Laboratories, Inc.. (Hatch, Ryan)
July 17, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER re: #23 . In light of exigent circumstances, Motion to Appear by Telephone is GRANTED. Ryan Hatch, plaintiff's lead counsel, is directed to call Chambers' number at 718-613-2230. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/17/2018. (Weisberg, Peggy)
July 11, 2018 Filing 22 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Hatch, Ryan)
July 9, 2018 Filing 21 Letter Motion to Appear by Telephone by Biozone Laboratories, Inc.. (Hatch, Ryan)
July 9, 2018 Filing 20 Notice of MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Alan D. Sege Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0207-10568193. by Biozone Laboratories, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Alan D. Sege in support of Motion to Admit Counsel, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Hatch, Ryan)
July 9, 2018 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan E. Hatch on behalf of Biozone Laboratories, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Hatch, Ryan)
July 9, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER denying #21 Motion to Appear by Telephone. The Court requires personal appearances by counsel in charge at all Initial Status Conferences. The Court will consider telephone appearances for later proceedings. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/9/2018. (Weisberg, Peggy)
July 9, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #20 Alan D. Sege's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for plaintiff. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at the NYEDs homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/9/2018. (Weisberg, Peggy)
July 3, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #16 Ryan E. Hatch's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for plaintiff. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at the NYEDs homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/3/2018. (Weisberg, Peggy)
July 2, 2018 Filing 18 Certificate of Good Standing in support of Ryan E. Hatch, Esq.'s #16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; filed on behalf of Biozone Laboratories, Inc. (Tajika, Mioko) Modified. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
July 2, 2018 Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re #16 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Ryan E. Hatch Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0207-10555451. of Ryan E. Hatch by Biozone Laboratories, Inc. (Tajika, Mioko)
July 2, 2018 Filing 16 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Ryan E. Hatch Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0207-10555451. by Biozone Laboratories, Inc.. (Tajika, Mioko)
July 2, 2018 Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against Biozone Laboratories, Inc. by Richard Rigg, Next Step Laboratories Corp.. (Golden, Robert)
July 2, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert B. Golden on behalf of Next Step Laboratories Corp., Richard Rigg (aty to be noticed) (Golden, Robert)
June 15, 2018 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Biozone Laboratories, Inc.. Next Step Laboratories Corp. served on 6/11/2018, answer due 7/2/2018; Richard Rigg served on 6/11/2018, answer due 7/2/2018. (Tajika, Mioko)
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #12 Mike Khoa N. Vo's Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for defendants. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at the NYEDs homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 6/15/2018. (Weisberg, Peggy)
June 14, 2018 Filing 12 Notice of MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Mike N. Vo Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0207-10511941. by Next Step Laboratories Corp., Richard Rigg. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Mike Vo in support of Motion to Admit Counsel, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Vo, Mike)
June 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 7/18/2018 at 11:00 AM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 6/7/2018. (Weisberg, Peggy)
June 6, 2018 Filing 10 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 6, 2018 Filing 9 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 6, 2018 Filing 7 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (Rocco, Christine)
June 5, 2018 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Next Step Laboratories Corp., Richard Rigg. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 5, 2018 This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 5, 2018 Case assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
June 5, 2018 Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Biozone Laboratories, Inc. (Tajika, Mioko)
June 5, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE by Biozone Laboratories, Inc. Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent (Tajika, Mioko)
June 5, 2018 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Biozone Laboratories, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Creative Concept Holdings, LLC for Biozone Laboratories, Inc.. (Tajika, Mioko)
June 5, 2018 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Biozone Laboratories, Inc. (Tajika, Mioko)
June 5, 2018 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Biozone Laboratories, Inc. (Tajika, Mioko)
June 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Next Step Laboratories Corp. filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10486640 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Biozone Laboratories, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Tajika, Mioko)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Biozone Laboratories, Inc. v. Next Step Laboratories Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Next Step Laboratories Corp.
Represented By: Mike Khoa N. Vo
Represented By: Robert B. Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Rigg
Represented By: Mike Khoa N. Vo
Represented By: Robert B. Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Biozone Laboratories, Inc.
Represented By: Ryan E. Hatch
Represented By: Mioko Catherine Tajika
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?