Sands v. Vice Media LLC
| Steve Sands |
| Vice Media LLC |
| 1:2018cv03622 |
| June 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Continue: Plaintiff's counsel writes to request an adjournment of the August 28, 2018 initial conference. ECF No. 12. This is plaintiff's first request and defendant consents. The request is granted. The Court shall hold an initial conference September 13, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 11A South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. The parties shall exchange their Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures and file their Rule 26(f) Meeting Report with the Court by September 6, 2018. Parties are advised that they must contact each other before making any request for an adjournment to the Court. Any request for an adjournment must be received in writing at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 7/27/2018. (Doody, Sara)
|
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference by Steve Sands. (Freeman, James) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court shall hold an initial conference August 28, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 11A South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. The parties shall exchange their Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures and file their Rule 26(f) Meeting Report with the Court by August 21, 2018. Parties are advised that they must contact each other before making any request for an adjournment to the Court. Any request for an adjournment must be received in writing at least forty-eight (48) hours before the scheduled conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 7/17/2018. (Doody, Sara)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Vice Media LLC. (Rosenthal, Edward) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Vice Media LLC identifying Corporate Parent Vice Group Holding, Inc. for Vice Media LLC. (Rosenthal, Edward) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew John Ungberg on behalf of Vice Media LLC (aty to be noticed) (Ungberg, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward H. Rosenthal on behalf of Vice Media LLC (aty to be noticed) (Rosenthal, Edward) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steve Sands. Vice Media LLC served on 6/25/2018, answer due 7/16/2018. (Freeman, James) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Rocco, Christine) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Vice Media LLC. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Steve Sands re #1 Complaint, Copyright Form AO 121 (Freeman, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vice Media LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10530061 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Steve Sands. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover, #5 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons) (Freeman, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sands v. Vice Media LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steve Sands | |
| Represented By: | James H. Freeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vice Media LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew John Ungberg |
| Represented By: | Edward H. Rosenthal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
