Premium Sports Inc. v. Bogich et al

Plaintiff: Premium Sports Inc.
Defendant: Daddo Bogich and K & M Cafe LLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv03922
Filed: July 9, 2018
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Brooklyn Office
0 Judge: Ann M Donnelly
1 Judge: James Orenstein
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:501
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
July 9, 2018 7 Notice of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Attachments: #1 complaint) (Rocco, Christine)
July 9, 2018 6 Summons Issued as to Daddo Bogich, K & M Cafe LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summon) (Davis, Kimberly)
July 9, 2018 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 9, 2018 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 9, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
July 9, 2018 3 NOTICE by Premium Sports Inc. re #1 Complaint, Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Copyright (Lonstein, Julie)
July 9, 2018 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Premium Sports Inc. (Lonstein, Julie)
July 9, 2018 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10567703 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Premium Sports Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for Deft. Daddo Bogich, #3 Proposed Summons for Deft. K & M Cafe LLC) (Lonstein, Julie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Premium Sports Inc. v. Bogich et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daddo Bogich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K & M Cafe LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Premium Sports Inc.
Represented By: Julie Cohen Lonstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?