Zellermaier v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff: Alter Zellermaier
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank
Case Number: 1:2018cv04125
Filed: July 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Steven Tiscione
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2018 Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by JPMorgan Chase Bank (Turcotte, Christopher)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Any and all deadlines regarding briefing of a motion to dismiss are terminated. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/18/2018. (Abdallah, Fida)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER: The Court directs that the parties will file a joint stipulation of dismissal by 10/3/18. The dates for briefing Defendant's motion to dismiss are stayed until further notice. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/4/2018. (Rediker, Ezekiel)
August 31, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by JPMorgan Chase Bank (Turcotte, Christopher)
August 30, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE Designating Case to Arbitration and NOTICE of Arbitration Hearing: Arbitration Hearing set for 1/10/2019 10:00 AM. Counsel will select the Arbitrator to hear the case on or before December 1, 2018, 2018 from the Courts Panel of Arbitrators which can be found at: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/adr. Counsel will submit a fully executed Stipulation for Selection of Arbitrator (see attached) by email to the Arbitration Coordinator: Rita Credle at: rita_credle@nyed.uscourts.gov. Please do not enter the Stipulation for Selection of Arbitrator on the docket. [Notice mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff, Zellermaier 1271 46th Street Brooklyn, NY 11219 ] (Credle, Rita) Modified on 8/30/2018 (Credle, Rita). Modified on 8/30/2018 (Credle, Rita).
August 30, 2018 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (Credle, Rita)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: In lieu of holding a pre-motion conference and requiring a full briefing of Defendant's proposed motion to dismiss, the Court construes Defendant's pre-motion conference request #5 as a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff shall file a response by 9/3/18 in letter form, not to exceed five pages. Defendant may file a reply in letter form, not to exceed five pages, by 9/24/18. The Court will hold a hearing on the motion to dismiss on 10/11/18 at 2 P.M. in Courtroom 4F North. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/2/2018. (Rediker, Ezekiel)
July 26, 2018 Filing 5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference/Motion to Dismiss in Contemplation of Defendant Filing a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) by JPMorgan Chase Bank. (Turcotte, Christopher) Modified on 8/3/2018 as per Order dated 8/2/2018. (Abdallah, Fida)
July 20, 2018 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 20, 2018 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 19, 2018 Case assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 19, 2018 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by JPMorgan Chase Bank identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co. for JPMorgan Chase Bank. (Turcotte, Christopher)
July 19, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JPMorgan Chase Bank from Kings County Supreme Court, case number 512591/2018. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10596369) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Turcotte, Christopher) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2018: #2 Affidavit of Service) (Bowens, Priscilla).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zellermaier v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank
Represented By: Christopher B. Turcotte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alter Zellermaier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?