Nagessar v. Northeast Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Tarasmatti Nagessar
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Northeast Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp.
Case Number: 1:2018cv06709
Filed: November 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Kiyo A Matsumoto
Referring Judge: Ramon E Reyes
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Honorable Kiyo A. Matsumoto has assigned this case to me for all pretrial purposes. Accordingly, if service is not made upon defendants by February 19, 2019 or plaintiff fails to show good cause why such service has not been effected, I will recommend that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice. Plaintiff is required to advise the Clerk of Court of any change of address. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. on 1/10/2019. C/mailed w/Attachments: #1 Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. (Service upon Defendants due by 2/19/2019.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Northeast Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp.. (Bowens, Priscilla)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1-10, Northeast Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp., filed by Tarasmatti Nagessar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number 4653134588 (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nagessar v. Northeast Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northeast Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tarasmatti Nagessar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?