Gonzalez v. Wasch et al
| Blanne Gonzalez |
| US FOODS, INC. and Robert Wasch |
| 1:2018cv07083 |
| December 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nina Gershon |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter by US Foods, Inc., Robert Wasch (Kelly, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration and Notice of Arbitration hearing. Arbitration Hearing set for 4/11/2019 10:00 AMPlease select the arbitrator on or before February 21, 2019 from the courts panel of arbitrators. The courts panel of arbitrators is located on the courts website: www.nyed.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolutionComplete and e-mail the attached Stipulation for Selection of Arbitrator to Rita Credle, ADR Coordinator, at: rita_credle@nyed.uscourts.gov. Please do not docket the Stipulation on CM/ECF. (Credle, Rita) |
ORDER: The Court notes that Plaintiff indicated in the #5 civil cover sheet that this case is eligible for arbitration. Accordingly, this case is referred to arbitration. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 1/9/2019. (Riquelme, Claudia)
|
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet.. by US Foods, Inc., Robert Wasch (Kelly, John) |
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Defense counsel is directed to show cause by January 11, 2019 why a completed civil cover sheet, that includes the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY, has not been filed yet. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 1/4/2019. (Riquelme, Claudia)
|
| NOTICE - Counsel is advised to resubmit a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case assigned to Judge Nina Gershon and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by US Foods, Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by US FOODS, INC., Robert Wasch ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-11022112) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kelly, John) Modified on 12/20/2018 (Bowens, Priscilla). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
