Abdul-Malik v. Office of Court Administration et al
| Salim Abdul-Malik |
| Sherrill Spatz, Unified Court System for the 11th Judicial District, Francis Kenna, Esq., Tamara Kersh, Audrey Pheffer, Kelly Ann Porter, Office of Court Administration, Daniel Friedman, Esq., Susan Woods, Kevin Rothermel, Maria L. Bradley, Kevin Morrissey, Esq., Pat Kelly and R. Teichman |
| 1:2018cv07361 |
| December 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Steven M Gold |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for Reconsideration by Salim Abdul-Malik. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted and because it seeks monetary relief against defendants who are immune from such relief, 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); that any state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; that the plaintiffs application for the appointment of counsel is denied; that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (C/mailed Judgment and Appeals package) Signed by Jalitza Poveda Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer Clerk of Court on 1/31/2019. (Ramesar, Thameera) |
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court does not have the authority to intervene in an ongoing case, which the plaintiff filed in state court, simply because he does not like the pace of the state court proceeding or the methods by which it enforces its procedures. For the reasons set forth above, the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted and because it seeks monetary relief against defendants who are immune from such relief. Any state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiff's application for the appointment of counsel is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 1/29/2019. (Greene, Donna)
|
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 4 Pro Se Consent to Electronic Notification by Salim Abdul-Malik (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Salim Abdul-Malik. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Salim Abdul-Malik. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Salim Abdul-Malik. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Letter) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
